Solar Cells Linked to Greenhouse Gases Over 23,000 Times Worse than Carbon Dioxide PDF Print E-mail
10.06.2012

Book cover "Green Illusions"The University of Nebraska Press just published a book by Ozzie Zehner, visiting scholar at the University of California, Berkeley STSC. In his book "Green Illusions" Ozzie Zehner points to the curious fact that solar cells do not offset greenhouse gases or curb fossil fuel use in the United States:

 

"Green Illusions explains how the solar industry has grown to become one of the leading emitters of hexafluoroethane (C2F6), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). These three potent greenhouse gases, used by solar cell fabricators, make carbon dioxide (CO2) seem harmless.

 

Hexafluoroethane has a global warming potential that is 12,000 times higher than CO2, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It is 100 percent manufactured by humans, and survives 10,000 years once released into the atmosphere. Nitrogen trifluoride is 17,000 times more virulent than CO2, and SF6, the most treacherous greenhouse gas, is over 23,000 times more threatening."

 

"Even worse, there's no evidence that solar cells offset fossil fuel use in the American context." Zehner explains that alternative energy subsidies keep retail electricity costs incrementally lower, which then spurs demand. "It's a boomerang effect," remarks Zehner. "The harder we throw alternative energy into the electrical grid, the harder demand comes back to hit us on the head. Historically, we've filled that demand by building more fossil fuel plants, not fewer."

 

Read press release

 

Comments  

 
# Stefan 2012-06-11 12:48
Wo bleibt bei der Ankündigung dieses Buches denn die "kritische und ideologiefreie Hinterfragung" die auf der Unterseite "Was macht Ökowatch" propagiert wird? Wenn die Zahlen und Behauptungen denn stimmen, in welcher Relation stehen sie zu den Emissionen, die beim Bau und Betrieb eines Kohle-, Gas-, Öl- oder Atomkraftwerks freigesetzt werden? Wenn der letzte Absatz tatsächlich stimmt, ist das eine Besonderheit der USA oder auch bei uns so? Wenn es so ist, sind das kurzfristige Effekte oder dauern sie an?
Über Antworten würde ich mich freuen.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

Bitte beachten Sie die Diskussionsregeln:
http://oekowatch.org/index.php/de/oekowatch-blog/diskussionsregeln
Please adhere to our discussion rules:
http://oekowatch.org/index.php/en/articles/discussion-rules


Security code
Refresh